Are we making food safety standards too complicated?

While food safety standards are crucial, their growing complexity detracts from their primary goal: ensuring safe food. Embracing simplicity isn’t just practical; it’s essential for more effective and sustainable food safety.
=Reading time: < 1 minute
Marc Cwikowski
July 2, 2024

Leonardo da Vinci said it best: “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.”

It’s easy to get lost in the details and lose sight of the main goal—keeping our food safe.

After years of setting and auditing standards, I’ve seen firsthand how complexity hampers efficiency, effectiveness, and commitment. In contrast, simple standards bring clarity and consistency, benefiting businesses and food safety.

Here are ten reasons why simpler is better:

  1. The focus remains on critical food safety aspects.
  2. Easier understanding leads to better compliance.
  3. Clear communication is more achievable.
  4. Uniform implementation becomes standard.
  5. Responsibilities are more straightforward to assign.
  6. Mistakes compromising food safety are less likely.
  7. Employee engagement in food safety practices increases.
  8. Employees feel less overwhelmed.
  9. Implementation and maintenance are more efficient.
  10. Audits become more targeted and meaningful.

While food safety standards are crucial, their growing complexity detracts from their primary goal: ensuring safe food. Embracing simplicity isn’t just practical; it’s essential for more effective and sustainable food safety.

Let’s simplify to amplify food safety.

May this resonate with those responsible for setting and evolving food safety standards.

You may also like...

Learning from Aviation: A Perspective on Food Safety Auditing

Our interest in learning from other sectors comes from a question: if food safety is a public health field, why not learn from industries like aviation that manage life-critical risks daily? Gaining knowledge from an industry with established auditing practices improves our judgment and recognizes food safety auditing as a crucial safety discipline, comparable to those in the most demanding industries.
Marc Cwikowski
February 3, 2026

Boards don’t need more audit data. They need better insight.

Internal quality and food safety audits generate extensive data, but only some of it influences board decisions. When reports focus on findings and compliance, they serve as operational updates rather than governance tools. Boards care about vulnerabilities, potential consequences, and risk trends. Framing audit results around these concerns shifts them toward what they should be.
Marc Cwikowski
January 27, 2026

Why Audit Volume Is Not the Same as Audit Assurance

Organizations often view audit numbers as proof of quality and food safety oversight. Internal audits are conducted, suppliers are assessed, and certification bodies report regularly. Yet serious failures still occur. This highlights an important issue: audit amounts are often mistaken for assurance. More audits do not automatically make systems stronger; coherent audits do. The key is whether audits, collectively, reveal what the organization truly needs to know.
Marc Cwikowski
January 5, 2026