Integrity in Auditing: Practiced or Performed?

At the end of the day, an integrity program isn’t about appearances. It’s about building trust from the inside out.
=Reading time: 2 minutes
Tülay Kahraman
July 7, 2025

Integrity programs are often cited as part of audit frameworks, but it’s not always clear how fully they’re embraced. Are they genuinely shaping how audits are planned and executed, or mostly sitting on the sidelines?

So let’s ask the question: “Is your integrity program something that lives and breathes in your audit function? Or is it a static document that ticks a box?”

Why Integrity Programs Matter More Than Ever

An integrity or quality assurance program isn’t just about reviewing your work—it’s about making sure that how you operate truly reflects what you stand for and the value you promise to deliver to the business.

It protects the reputation of the audit function. It gives leaders confidence in the outcomes.
It shows your team and the organization that values and principles aren’t just talked about. They’re practiced.

And perhaps most importantly, it helps audit teams continuously learn, improve, and stay focused on what truly matters.

What Does a Real Integrity Program Look Like?

To be meaningful, integrity programs need to reflect both what is on paper and what happens in practice. That means combining two types of insight:

  1. Desk-based Insight: This is the part many are most probably doing:
  • Reviewing audit files and reports
  • Checking compliance with procedures and standards
  • Tracking timelines, budgets, and documentation quality
  • Conducting self-assessments from time to time

These tools give us structure and consistency, but they only show half the picture.

  1. Field-Based Insight: The real insight comes when we look beyond the files and step into how audits actually unfold:
  • Watching how auditors interact, ask questions, and hold space for dialogue
  • Hearing from auditees about what the experience felt like, not just whether the findings were accurate
  • Observing how people handle difficult conversations, pressure, or ethical grey zones
  • Looking at what happens after the audit – are findings understood and properly addressed?

Because if audit results don’t translate into safer practices, improved procedures, or changed behaviors, then what real value are we providing?

When we see the audit in action, we start to understand not just whether it followed the rules, but also whether it reflected the values.

What the Best Integrity Programs Have in Common

Look across leading audit functions, whether in the public or private sector, and you’ll see a few things in common. They:

  • Monitor continuously, not just annually: This emphasizes the importance of ongoing oversight and quality control, ensuring issues are identified and addressed in real-time, not just during scheduled reviews. It reflects a proactive, embedded approach to integrity.
  • Check the field, not just the files: This reinforces the idea that real behavior, decision-making, and interaction must be observed. Desk reviews alone don’t reveal how values are applied under pressure or how audits are conducted in practice.
  • Welcome external feedback and open review: By inviting independent assessments and stakeholder perspectives, audit functions stay grounded and avoid blind spots. This also boosts transparency and credibility.
  • Take action and track the results: It’s not enough to identify gaps; what matters is how the function responds and improves over time. This reflects accountability and commitment to continuous learning.

At the end of the day, an integrity program isn’t about appearances. It’s about building trust from the inside out. It’s about showing your team, your leadership, and your stakeholders that your audit function stands for something more than just compliance.

So, do you have an integrity program?

 

You may also like...

An Audit Writes a Shared Story Before It Begins

When preparation strengthens collaboration rather than polishing documentation, the audit becomes more than a checkpoint. It becomes a moment of collective clarity and, sometimes unexpectedly, a source of shared memories that bind teams together long after the audit cycle ends.
Tülay Kahraman
March 3, 2026

Preparing the Next Generation of Auditors: A Reflection for Food Safety Auditing

The next generation will not simply inherit the profession. They will reshape it. The question is whether current structures are ready to evolve with them, or whether they will try to force tomorrow’s auditors into yesterday’s roles.
Tülay Kahraman
February 17, 2026

Learning from Aviation: A Perspective on Food Safety Auditing

Our interest in learning from other sectors comes from a question: if food safety is a public health field, why not learn from industries like aviation that manage life-critical risks daily? Gaining knowledge from an industry with established auditing practices improves our judgment and recognizes food safety auditing as a crucial safety discipline, comparable to those in the most demanding industries.
Marc Cwikowski
February 3, 2026